http://morningsentin...1538353628.html
Atwood guilty of murder
SKOWHEGAN - Family and friends of the victim wept Wednesday when Shannon Atwood was found guilty of murdering his girlfriend in the summer of 2006.
Justice Nancy Mills delivered her decision in Somerset County Superior Court following a five-day, jury-waived trial last week.
Atwood was convicted of murdering Cheryl Murdoch, 38, and leaving her bludgeoned body in the woods of rural Canaan, where police discovered it Aug. 11, 2006. The charge that he also murdered his estranged wife, Shirley Moon Atwood, 35, was dropped in Nov. 2007. She has been missing since April 2006.
"Thankfully we have a guilty verdict and justice has come from the system," Lucille Hoxie, the victim's mother, said after the verdict was read. "We can all rest a little easy. (Atwood) will never be able to hurt or murder another woman. Our hope is he will never leave prison again."
Defense attorney John Alsop said the judge was obviously "compelled by the evidence. That's the way the system works."
When asked if he thought his client was guilty, he said: "He always has pled not guilty . . . The thing I do believe in, is our system of justice."
Prosecutor Andrew Benson said he was pleased with the verdict and has asked for a forensic examination of Atwood as part of the pre-sentencing investigation. He said that with Atwoodâ's "personality characteristics" he was at risk of (being involved in) future dangerous situations given his prior record.
Atwood, in 1993, was sentenced to serve six years in jail with all but three years suspended for attacking and choking nearly to death a Somerset County hairdresser, Jennifer Nickerson Steward.
The penalty for a murder conviction is 25 years to life in prison, Benson said. He expects it may be at least 60 days before a sentence is handed down.
Atwood registered no reaction when the verdict was read.
In a lengthy decision, Mills praised defense attorneys John Alsop and Arnold Clark for their diligence on the case and then listed issue-by-issue the how she reached her decision.
Mills said that despite defense arguments to the contrary, the witnesses in the case were credible.
"They may lead lives very different from our own, but that does not mean they are not worthy of belief," she said. She said that because they may have been nervous "does not mean they're lying and after 17 years, I know the difference."
Mills singled out the testimony of several witnesses, including Leslie Miner and Rachel Hooker and said she found credible their recounting of instances when Atwood had talked to them on the phone.
Mills, reading from her notes, alluded to facts about how the body was found, that Murdoch died of blunt force trauma and that "a significant amount of force was used,"that were part of her decision-making process.
The level of decomposition coincided with the July 27, 2006 time frame of when Murdoch was last heard from and Aug. 11, when the body was found. She said she took into account Atwood's cigarette butts found at a fire pit a short distance from the crime scene and rope at the crime scene that was the same as rope found at the home Atwood shared with Shirley Moon Atwood and later with Cheryl Murdoch.
Mill said she was satisfied that a Waterville woman was mistaken in her belief she saw Murdoch after July 27 in Waterville.
Of the alternative suspect theory that she had allowed the defense to explore, Mills said there was no "credible evidence" that Murdoch's ex-husband, Donald, or Shirley Moon Atwood -or anybody else other than the defendant, played a role in the murder.
Mills said there was no evidence to support the defense's theory that Shirley Atwood, missing since April 2006, could have committed the murder and may be hiding out. Shirley Atwood was not available to be involved in the death or to be leaving evidence at the home she once shared with her husband, Shannon Atwood, the judge said.
Mills offered high praise for investigators, especially for Detective Jeffrey Love, whom she said didextensive and exhaustive investigation into the disappearance of Shirley Moon Atwood before she was ruled out as a suspect. She said he checked credit cards, food stamps, stores, witnesses, reports of sightings and, she suspected, would have gone door-to-door, if he could have before eliminating her.
Mills also referred to Shannon Atwood's incriminating tape-recorded interviews with police, during which he said "all your leads lead right back to me," and "I've been to (expletive deleted) prison and out for 12 years . . . I'm pretty proud of that . . . and I ain't going back."
She also referred to his "holding a weapon positioned to fire" at state police in Aug. 13 and to Atwood's interviews with state police on Aug. 9 and Aug. 10, during which she said the "tenor of those two interviews (changed) dramatically . . . like a completely different person."
Just because the state police remained with their original suspect, Shannon Atwood, did not mean the investigation was of poor quality, Mills said. "It means when you look at the flow . . . all the arrows point to Mr. Atwood," or as stated, "all your leads lead back to me," Mills said.
And finally, she said, evidence says Atwood murdered Cheryl Murdoch using extreme force, disposed of her body, later called Rachel Hooker while smoking a cigarette at the fire pit near where the body was found.
Atwood was ordered held without bail pending a sentencing investigation as soon as the defense council is prepared, Mills said.
Benson said the search for Shirley Moon Atwood remains a live investigation.
Shirley Atwood's sister, Candy Daniels of Idaho, was satisfied: "We are so glad we have justice for Cheryl. I'm glad he will stay behind bars for the rest of his life. Hopefully he will tell us where Shirley's body is so we can get closure."
Attorneys in Somerset and Kennebec Counties did not find Mills' guilty verdict surprising.
"I haven't followed all the evidence that closely, but based on what I know, it not surprising," said Robert E. Sandy of Sherman and Sandy in Waterville. "Circumstantial evidence that is persuasive is pretty much the same as direct evidence . . . . The defense did an admirable job to provide such an effective response."
Skowhegan Attorney Warren Shay said it was tough case to call.
"I'm not surprised, but it was a close case. I would not have been terribly surprised by a not-guilty verdict either," Shay said. "Really, in the courtroom, it is what the judge or the jury sees. To just read about it you don't get a true picture . . . . The key is how it sounds."
Waterville Attorney Pamela J. Ames, said it was difficult to decide which way the verdict was going to go.
She said that when Mills ruled that the alternative suspect theory could come into evidence, it was obvious the defense was going to be given every opportunity to press any theories that they had to make sure the court had a "complete picture."
"I've (worked on) circumstantial evidence cases; they're not slam dunk cases," Ames said.